Gardaí at Pride: Don’t Reign on my Parade

Members of An Garda Síochána (AGS) will be marching in uniform at Dublin Pride this year, and the news was met with mixed feelings. Personally, I wasn’t sure what to think, half my friends were outraged, and the other half were outraged at the outrage. I read that most people were happy with it, which felt untrue to me. So, I decided to run a twitter poll to get a better sense of people’s opinions.

2’694 votes later and 53% were unhappy about it, while 47% where happy. The comments gave some insight into how divisive this topic is for the community.

So, what’s the problem?

For those in favour, gardaí marching represents acceptance of LGBTQ+ people within Irish Society and shows that gardaí are not only for LGBTQ+ people, but they are in fact made up of LGBTQ+ people. For those against it, the gardaí marching is the complete antithesis of what pride is meant to be: a political march, a riot, by the LGBTQ+ community for the LGBTQ+ community. For some marginalised and targeted people, gardaí marching in uniform at Pride shows them that the parade is more about empty symbolism than making them feel comfortable and safe.

This is not an Ireland-only debate. Last year in Madison, Wisconsin, Police were told they could not march in uniform. While some were disappointed, the decision was a largely positive one, prompting the police force to engage further with the community. Auckland also banned police in uniform from Pride, the organisers said the police did not “currently meet the degree of safety and awareness of intersectionality required by our rainbow communities”.

But, isn’t Pride all about inclusivity?

This is the main argument I heard from people, that if you exclude Gardaí you aren’t being very inclusive. I don’t think this argument holds any water. Firstly, inclusivity does not mean letting any group march. Inclusivity means everyone from the community is catered for — and while there are LGBT gardaí, they can still be included by marching in civilian clothes. Inclusivity means we make arrangements for the most marginalised (gardaí are not marginalised), it means we try to make a space safe in a world that isn’t. Not allowing Gardaí to march is not exclusion, it’s boundaries.

It’s also interesting to hear people calling for “inclusion” when speaking about Gardaí marching but not when Pride was nearly completely inaccessible to those with mobility disabilities. If we’re going to argue about inclusion perhaps we should start with disabled members of the LGBT community.

People are still being targeted today by Gardaí. I know this because I’ve spoken in private to those who have. This has come from friends/acquaintances, many of whom are QPOC, homeless or housing insecure, a lot of them are trans.

One example involves a person being told if they don’t cooperate the garda will press on their neck until they are unconscious. Another is of a friend reporting a hate crime and being told that they shouldn’t dress that way if they don’t want to be picked on. Someone I know was spat on by a garda at pride last year. Not to mention the armed gardaí at evictions, especially considering that homelessness disproportionately impacts LGBT folks. People have made the arguments that these were individuals having a bad experience with individual Gardaí. But individual interactions are part of a pattern, part of decades of similar abuse suffered by the same type of queer people. It can still be systematic abuse even if you are no longer part of the targeted group.

And I know people who’ve had really positive interactions with the gardaí, or none at all. But it’s not a competition; a good interaction with a garda doesn’t cancel out a bad interaction with a garda. AGS have made efforts to bridge the gap between law enforcement and the LGBT community, engaging with organisations like TENI and having regular community meetings at OutHouse. Is this enough to see them marching in uniform at Pride? And the key words are *in uniform*

More than a uniform

The uniform means something; It represents the AGS, it represents their authority over civilians, and for some it represents oppression. On one hand i’m being asked to consider the individually of the Gardaí, and my answer is that in uniform they are not individuals. I will wish any Garda in civvys a happy pride.

Historically, interactions with gardaí around pride was for the safety of the people marching. It was born out of necessity. And the bulk of labour in terms of bridging that gap was done by LGBT people, not the gardaí.

Our concerns have changed in recent years. We’re less afraid (but not unafraid) of being attacked on the streets, and more afraid of becoming systematically jobless, homeless and without healthcare. We’re not afraid of the man in the ally, we’re afraid of the man in the ivory tower, the man who makes policies about housing, social protection, the man who puts us in prison.

To think that AGS is not a tool of oppression is to be unaware of the many issues surrounding AGS. Dara Quigley is dead just over 2 years having been bullied by police. No one has been held accountable. Families are be shoved into direct provision camps, masked armed gardaí evicting people, rape cases not being investigated.

And just on Sunday, a horrific video of police attacking a 15 year old in Balbriggan was released on twitter, and beneath it families shared similar stories of being targeted by AGS. When I first saw the video it was very familiar, a black child on the ground, a swarm of white police on top of him. I thought this must be from the USA, but no, it’s in Ireland.

A community divided: Dismantling VS Reform

The community is divided. There was a Pride Bloc last year, a group who were opposed to corporate involvement in Pride, as organised by Queer Action Ireland. Regarding AGS marching this year they have said “Policing in inherently racist and oppressive…Queer liberation is the dismantling of the institutions of power..”. Again, this is a shift felt the world over. I’m currently working in New York and was handed a flyer for an alternative pride march — no corporates, no cops.

But dismantling the police is a tall order for many people to get on board with. Many people would like to see reform as opposed to a revolution. Small, systematic changes over time. Especially for those who have been protected by police, the idea of abolition is scary and radical.

Pride should be met with this golden question: Who is it for? Is the gardaí marching for the LGBT community or is it for AGS, or is it for allies? The community is not a monolith, and we can’t agree on everything, but we could agree on a principle of Do No Harm, or more realistically, try to do as little harm as possible. The argument about cops at pride is practically the same as the argument about corporates at Pride — who is it for?

Being completely on brand as an indecisive messy bisexual myself I am somewhere in the middle of these two groups: slowly learning more about systematic oppression and being less convinced reform is possible, and wanting with all the swag. I want to have my complimentary pride burrito and eat it too. I want the fan fare, I need the sponsorship that comes with corporate involvement in Pride, and I desperately want to reject it all and go live in a lesbian commune in the woods.

How to guard everyone’s Pride

Some advocating for AGS to march in uniform are part of the older generation of queer activists. They have faced adversity in Irish society that I will never know. If they can welcome the gardaí, why can’t I? I can’t because I understand that oppression is complex, nuanced, spread out through the system like spores. Cis white gay men should not be the litmus test by which we measure all oppression. We have to listen to other parts of the community, and they have made themselves perfectly clear.

Thanks to Clare Ní Cheallaigh and Ed O’Brien Hogan for editing